Showing posts with label Gentrification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gentrification. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Criminalization of Urban Poverty by Turkish Prime Minister



reblogged from Reclaim Istanbul
by Yaşar Adnan Adanalı
Economic and social factors such as poverty, unemployment, bad housing and urban sprawl have been important factors that have fed terrorism year after year, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said in Istanbul today.
Speaking during an event in Gazioşmanpaşa district to preside over the demolition of hundreds of homes – ostensibly for the purposes of constructing modern housing in their place – Erdoğan made a connection between terrorism and bad urbanization.
“While in the east our soldiers and police officers fought terrorism, [previous governments] did nothing about the poverty, unemployment and discrimination that terrorist groups abused. They shut their eyes to the migration to big cities while they were building shanty houses. Urban sprawl became places of abuse that hid terrorism,” Erdoğan said, emphasizing that young people with no hope for the future became vulnerable targets of such groups. “We will transform those swamps into rose and tulip gardens.”
Erdoğan also responded to criticism about the 63-member Wise Persons’ Commission that held its first meeting on April 4 as part of its task of overseeing a peace process to end the Kurdish issue.
Erdoğan repeated that the seven groups of wise people that will visit each of Turkey’s seven regions to discuss the peace process would be free to do their own planning.
“We did not force them. But some seem very upset. Some cry out that they are not in the group, others are jealous. We are bustling about doing something to stop mothers’ tears, but some are still trying to gain [political] benefit,” he said.
Istanbul ‘overpopulated’
A former Istanbul mayor, Erdoğan also argued that Turkey’s fabled metropolis was too populous. “When I became mayor [in 1994], 8 million people lived in Istanbul. Now it’s 14 million. Is this how it should be? I don’t think so. We have to find a solution for migration,” he said.
The Turkish prime minister also criticized construction companies for building skyscrapers and tall buildings that now cover the entire Istanbul skyline, arguing that buildings should not be taller than four or five floors.
“We have to attach importance to aesthetics. You will tell me that 40- or 50-story buildings can de aesthetic, too. They can, I won’t deny it. But humans should live near the soil,” he said.

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

New Turkey wide Demolitions in the Name of Disaster Protection


 http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/id/25380523   text translated and links added by Cihan Baysal

''The Minister of Urban Affairs of Turkey has recently announced that the demolishments will start in October in 30 places simultaneously,  using dynamites in some .

The Minister of Urban Affairs, Bayraktar, declared that the agenda for the implementation of the Law on Areas Under Risk of Disasters has been materialized:
'' We will have a start which is going to cause reverberations. We are starting in October. In 30 or 40 different parts of Turkey, we will have demolishments'', stated Bayraktar. The prior cities will be Istanbul,Ankara,Izmir,Bursa,Kocaeli,Sakarya, Konya,Bolu and Van.

Upon the question of ''Do you experience any difficulty in social support?'', the Minister reflected that '' the people are very willing.We reached a dimension of voluntariness.Without getting tired,we explain to the people that they will be getting rid of their dilapidated  buildings under risk. Those who object to this, those who call it the 'transformation of rent/ profit' should come to me and tell me whom we are providing profit, I am expecting them to come''

Bayraktar stated that engineering studies are being made for demolishments that will take place in at least 30 cities. During the demolishments, alongside demolishing machines,explosion by  dynamite-a technique not familiar in Turkey- will also be used. Tests are being made in order not to cause any disasters via explosion by dynamite.It is notified that this technique will be used in places where the poplation is not dense. The Minister Bayraktar expressed that  because he did not like the word '' demolishment undertaker'' , they are looking for other words to coin the expression.

The financial portrait of demolishments hasn't been substantiated yet. The demolishments will give a start in October via 'ceremonies' and urban transformation is planned to be urgent in the first 2 years and scheduled to be finished in 5 stages in  3-5-7 and 10 year periods''.   

For the Law on Areas under risk of Disasters,please visit:http://direitoamoradia.org/?p=13059&lang=en

For the Minister's question on 'projects for rent/profit',
and

Suleymaniye: 

And the Tarlabasi renewal Project with 100 square meter luxurious offices going for 800.000 dollars while a 5 storey building owned by a resident was expropriated for 761.000 TL ( 423.000 dollars)!.So, the legally owned property is transferred to firms and companies:   

Friday, 13 July 2012

Poor but Proud Istanbul Neighborhood Faces Gentrification

By JESSICA BOURQUE
Published: July 4, 2012


“This is a good thing,” he said on a recent afternoon. “Everything here is in bad shape. No one here is washing or painting. They don’t know how to take care of the historical architecture of these buildings.”
“Here” is Tarlabasi, a low-income and primarily Kurdish neighborhood that also serves as a sanctuary for Turkey <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/turkey/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> ’s marginalized populations. In the heart of Istanbul, less than a five-minute walk from the Istiklal Caddesi shopping hub, Tarlabasi’s faded facades are in sharp contrast with Istiklal’s glitzy boutiques. The only thing separating Tarlabasi from the more affluent Beyoglu neighborhood is the six-lane Tarlabasi Boulevard, which has a police station equipped with a tank. 

Tarlabasi’s central location means it could become prime revenue-generating real estate, which is partly why Beyoglu Municipality officials and the Housing Development Administration of Istanbul, known by its Turkish acronym TOKI, declared it an urban renewal area in 2006.Six years later, after court battles over property rights, the project is moving forward. The renewal area encompasses a 20,000-square-meter, or 4.9-acre, section of Tarlabasi that includes 210 historic Ottoman-era buildings; demolition has been under way for a few months. 

At stake is Tarlabasi’s diverse culture. Migrant workers have a long history of living in Tarlabasi, dating from the early 1900s when Greek, Jewish and Armenian craftsmen lived in the area. But those groups were driven out by the wealth tax of 1942, which impoverished many non-Muslim workers, and in 1955 by riots that again focused on non-Muslims. Left vacant after the riots, many houses in Tarlabasi were taken over by workers who migrated from eastern Turkey to find work in Istanbul.
On its Web site, TOKI says the renewal process includes relocating residents to new housing complexes, “identifying the illegally settled households to be evicted” and clearing the land so it can be “regenerated through urban renewal projects.” These projects could include shopping malls, upscale housing units and urban recreational areas. The Beyoglu mayor, Ahmet Misbah Demircan, has said he wants the new Tarlabasi to rival the Champs-Élysées in Paris. 

While Mr. Yesildas, the furniture seller, calls the process a makeover, others see the transformation of Tarlabasi as a negative form of gentrification.The architect Huseyin Kaptan, director of the Istanbul Metropolitan Planning and Urban Design Center, said that TOKI’s renewal plan lacked foresight because it allowed the land to be developed by wealthy real estate investors who had no vested interest in preserving the culture of the area. 

“Unfortunately, this is very aggressive and very wrong,” he said during a recent interview. “To keep the social structure safe, you need to involve the people. Contractors get to build some modern thing — could be a shopping mall, could be a high-rise — but they have no regard for the people living there.” He added: “I call this kind of operation they’re doing, ‘killing them while kissing them.”’

Today, the area is home to a host of low-income laborers scraping by on the monthly minimum wage of 886.50 lire, or $493, or less, working jobs as unlicensed garbage collectors or serving as house cleaners for the better-off.Remziye Civak, 34, who keeps house for the owner of a publishing company, has lived in Tarlabasi for 18 years. Her immaculate two-room apartment also shelters her husband and their three children. “We are lucky,” she said. “We own our home, but many people are renting.” A place the size of her home rents for about 400 lire a month.

The sense of community is strong in Tarlabasi, Mrs. Civak said, and she would miss that if she had to move to a new housing complex in the suburbs. “My neighbors and I, we are like a big family,” she said. “If anyone is sick, I know I can call on my neighbor to come help. We are very close.”But she is nervous about the intensifying drug problems where she lives. “What really worries me is the drug use. It’s called pills. I don’t exactly what they are, but there is a lot of it going on,” she said, “I worry about my kids, because they are young and I think, ‘What if they get involved?”’ 

Yasar Adanali, an urban scholar, consultant and activist, said that, sadly, residents were not a priority for project planners.“Many kinds of informal, illegal migrants are living and seeking refuge in areas like Tarlabasi. Why? Because for them, it’s easier to find employment opportunities around Istiklal,” Mr. Adanali said during a recent interview.“This transformation plan doesn’t pay any attention to these social realities. Why not create social programs to help these people? Instead, they just take Tarlabasi as a problem zone, a cancer area that you need to erase from the map and rebuild for a completely new clientele,” one willing to spend money to become part of the economic boom in Istanbul and Turkey. 

“The city itself has become so deliciously profitable that you can make these kinds of real estate projects without actually involving the inhabitants of the area,” he said. “The real motive in these plans is the desire to make a profit.”It is also part of Turks’ desire to showcase Istanbul as a global city, “competing with global city-wannabes and global city-alreadys like London, New York or Dubai,” Mr. Adanali said. 

For now, local and expatriate students and artists attracted by this global metropolis are finding reasonable rents in Tarlabasi. Mitch Burmeister, an American university-entrance tutor, rented his first apartment there.
“I knew that it didn’t have the best reputation,” he said, “but I couldn’t pass up the rent. If you think of a city like Chicago, it would be like renting a dirt cheap apartment right off of Michigan Avenue.”
The notion that deep-pocketed foreigners are willing to live there only adds to the motivation for city officials to capitalize on the area, rebranding what was a zone of prostitution and drugs as a safe place to live.
The “new Tarlabasi” is advertised on a large billboard that hides demolished buildings from drivers along Tarlabasi Boulevard. The billboard depicts mostly light-skinned women wearing business clothes and strolling past a mall, an image far from the current reality there. 

While TOKI insists that Tarlabasi will maintain its historical architectural touches, Mr. Adanali fears the transformation will only create a facade to hide a sterile space. “It is a kind of ‘Disneyfication’ in the sense that it’s taking the area’s heritage and making it flashy,” he said, “like a Disney theme park. Everything becomes shallow.”Not all the houses in Tarlabasi are being “regenerated,” but some residents are still nervous about their future. Mrs. Civak said that while her house was not now included in the renewal plan, she could not be certain it would stay that way. “They’ve not told us much about what’s happening,” she said. 

Mr. Yesildas also conceded that he knew little about the project aside from what he had seen on the news. Still, he remains confident that the government’s plan will benefit Tarlabasi.“This area wasn’t meant to be permanent. It was supposed to change,” he said. “It has so many problems that need to be fixed. It should be clean and taken care of.”

Thursday, 1 March 2012

SIGN PETITION - TAKSIM BELONGS TO ALL OF US


Demonstration on Taksim indicating that the construction works is underway!


text from the same page:

TAKSİM PLATFORM: PRESS RELEASE AND SIGNATURE PETITION
What Does the Recently Proposed Taksim Project Involve?
The recently proposed Taksim Project calls for the construction of enormous ramps --10 meters deep and 100 meters long-- leading to subterranean tunnels directing traffic under Taksim Square. The ramps will be located at seven points near the square, including Gümüşsuyu, Sıraselviler, Mete, Tarlabaşı, and Cumhuriyet Boulevards. High concrete walls will be erected, and the existing sidewalks along the boulevards will be transformed into service roads. The trees in the vicinity will be cut down, and it will be difficult, if not impossible, to reach Taksim Square by foot. Underground tunnels will not solve the problems of urban transportation and traffic. Urban planners throughout the developed world have long since discredited them.

THE TAKSİM PROJECT IS NOT ABOUT MAKING THE SQUARE MORE PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY (despite claims otherwise)

How Was the Project Passed through Official Channels?
The present plans for Taksim Square were announced by the Prime Minister before the elections. The Istanbul Greater Metropolitan Parliament then approved them by vote, after which the Istanbul No. 2 Regional Agency for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage Sites passed the bill with speed unprecedented  for a “reconstruction project.”
Despite being a public initiative financed by city taxes, residents of the city and civic organizations have not been informed of, nor consulted about, the details of the project. The Metropolitan government has not provided any means for public discussion. It continues to ignore the voices of various groups and individuals who have the expertise to evaluate the effects this project will have on the urban fabric of Taksim.
THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN PLANNING AND PASSING THIS PROJECT VIOLATES EVERY PRINCIPLE OF PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY

What Do We Want?
We want transparency and the opportunity for input in the redesign of Taksim Square. Urban development plans should take into consideration those residing in nearby neighborhoods as well as those who work in and visit the area. Transportation projects should not be planned by decree from above, nor in isolation from their environment and residents. The latest holistic approaches need to be taken into consideration during the design of transportation systems, viewing them as part of the overall urban fabric.
As the highest-profile and most symbolic square in Turkey, Taksim Square means many things to people of many different walks of life. Democratic participation in deciding how to design and use this public space is just as important as it is in rewriting the Constitution.
The days of reckless urban development and planning without public consultation are long over. It’s time to do things differently. Let’s start with Taksim Square. Let’s join together and make this an example of how city officials can successfully work in conjunction with civic groups and citizens for a better designed city space for everyone.
We call upon the city officials of Istanbul to serve their constituents in a transparent and democratic way.
Taksim belongs to all of us!http://www.taksimplatformu.org/english.php

Wednesday, 22 February 2012

News on Tarlabaşı from BIANET.ORG

Kırlangıç Sokağın Son Sakinleri

Tarlabaşı'nda tüm komşuları giden Argiş ailesi, istemese de artık evi boşaltmak için mahkeme kararını bekliyor; çünkü sokak lambaları bile çalışmıyor.
İstanbul - BİA Haber Merkezi
16 Şubat 2012, Perşembe

Tarlabaşı'nda altı yıldır "kentsel dönüşüm" adı altında devam eden süreçte sokaklar bir bir boşalmaya devam ediyor.
Yıkılmayı bekleyen binaların çoğunun içleri çöp dolmuş; kapı, pencereleri sökülmüş. Pencereden sarkmış eski bir yorgan ya da duvarlara yazılı sözler, sokaklarda bir zamanlar yaşam olduğuna dair kalan son izler...
Küçükkırlangıç sokakta harap binaların arasında kalan Argiş ailesi de sokağın son sakinlerinden. Mardin'den 15 yıl önce İstanbul'a göç eden aile evi boşaltmak için bir türlü bitmek bilmeyen mahkeme sonucunu bekliyor.
Zar zor aldıkları 100 metrekarelik evleri için GAP inşaat 56 bin lira, ya da yeni projeden 51 metrekareye nerede olduğu belli olmayan bir ev teklif etti. Kabul etmeyince de "acil kamulaştırma" tehdidi ile "37 bin liraya düşürürüz" dedi.
Bahattin Argiş direnip dava açmış.
"Mahkemede biz onlara Demirören AVM için ödenen fiyatı emsal gösteriyoruz, onlar bize tehditle satın aldıkları evleri. Evlerini satan insanlar şimdi ağlıyor, içlerinde kalp krizi geçirenler var. Düşünebiliyor musunuz, üst komşunla aynı değerdeki evi korkundan satıyorsun, o ise dava açıp üç katına alıyor."

Mahkemede üç kata çıkıyor

İki yıldır mahkeme sonucunu bekliyor; şu anda evine 160 bin verilmesi planlanıyor. Yani ilk teklif edilenin üç katı.
Argiş mahkemenin fiyatı artırmasının mağduriyeti ortadan kaldırmadığını söylüyor; çünkü asıl mesele ailesiyle Tarlabaşı'nda yaşamaktan mutlu, işlerine yakın, komşuları vardı.
"İstanbul'a ilk geldiğimizde biz burada dostluklarımızı kurduk;  çocuklarım bu semtte büyüdü. İki oğlum ve ben Taksim'deki restaurantlarda çalışıyoruz, gece ikide işten çıkıyoruz, 10 dakikada evdeyiz.

Komşular gitti, çöpler kaldı

"Ama yok onlar bizi, Taksim'e layık görmediler. Şimdi o parayla aynı büyüklükte ve işime yakın ev bulmam imkansız. Her şeyden öte buraya alışmıştık, kahveye gittim mi 50 kişiyi tanırdım... "
Songül Argiş ne olacakları belli olmadığı için evlenme çağındaki iki oğlunu evlendiremediklerinden yakınıyor; bir de sokakların boşluğundan.
"Tüm komşular gitti, evlerin içi çöp içinde, kokudan geçilmiyor. Akşamları sokak lambası bile yanmıyor. Bu halde daha ne kadar kalabiliriz ki burada..."

Zincirci'ye verilen ev

Jirayr Zincirci de Tarlabaşı'nın en mağdurlarından biriydi; çünkü ne mülk sahibi ne de kiracıydı ama 30 yıllık Tarlabaşılıydı; iki ay önce küçücük odasından çıkarılmak isteniyordu.
bianet, Radikal ve Milliyet gazetesinin konuyu haber yapmasının üzerine, twitter üzerinden "jirayr amcaya ev" kampanyası başlatıldı. Bunun üzerine Beyoğlu Belediye Başkanı Misbah Demircan, Zincirci'ye ev verileceğini belirtti.
Haftasonu Zincirci, 30 yıllık minicik odasından ayrılıp, kız kardeşi ile birlikte Tarlabaşı'nda oturduğu yerin alt mahallesinden birinde minik bir eve yerleşti. Evinde ziyaret ettiğimiz Zincirci, kedilerini de yanına aldığında tamamen rahatlayacağını söyledi.

Diğer "Zincirci"ler?

Bizim haberi yaparken amacımız, acilen Zincirci'nin barınma hakkının karşılanması ama esasen Tarlabaşı'nda kentsel dönüşümün getirdiği mağduriyete dikkat çekmekti.
Demircan, bizzat devletin barınma hakkını hiçe sayarak yarattığı mağduriyeti giderdi. Şu an Zincirci memnun; peki diğer Tarlabaşılılar... Sorun sadece Zincirci değil ki.
Kiracılar zaten kentsel dönüşümün görünmez özneleri olarak Tarlabaşı'nı terk etti. Mülk sahiplerinin bir kısmı ihaleyi alan Çalık Grubu'na ait GAP inşaatın kurduğu ikna odalarında avukatları olmadan acil kamulaştırma tehdidi ile evlerini çok düşük fiyata sattı.
Bir kısım mülk sahibi ise her ne kadar mağduriyetlerini hiçbir zaman gideremeyecek de olsa kamulaştırmaya karşı açtıkları davaların sonucunu bekliyor.

Anıtlar Kurulu da görevini yapmadı

Tarlabaşı Mülk Sahipleri Derneği'nin avukatlığını yapan Barış Kaşka, en mağdurların korkudan evlerini yok pahasına satanlar olduğunu mahkemelik olanların da fiyat arttırımı kazansa dahi yine de bunun piyasa değerinin çok altında olduğunu söylüyor.
5366 sayılı yasanın en önemli maddesi "uzlaşma"nın "soylulaşma" pahasıne hiçe sayıldığını söyleyen Kaşka, dünyada örneği olmayan "Belediye, şirket" ortaklığıyla "kamu yararının zerresinin gözetilmediğini" belirtiyor.
Kaşka, binaların aslına uygun şekilde tarihi özellikleri korunarak yapılmasının mümkün olmadığını, zaten bunu denetlemesi gereken Anıtlar Kurulu'nun da görevini yapmadığını söylüyor.
Dernek Avan projenin iptali için Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi'ne (AİHM)  başvurmuştu. Ama bir ay içinde kamulaştırma davası ile ilgili AİHM'e ilk kez bireysel başvuru yapılacak. (NV)

Tuesday, 20 December 2011

Tarlabaşı Boulevard: preparing for demolition


Three weeks ago the bright yellow concretebarrier blocks were installed over night.  A few days later they were spray-painted with the ” Tarlabaşı” development logo  and the construction company “Gap İnșaat” to the side.  The workmen started changing the layout of the road and now concrete footings are going in place along the front.

Security guards have mobed in to prevent people from lighting fires; the building blocks are going up with the development logo featuring prominantly. (Jonathan Lewis)
There is only one functioning building left along one complete section of the boulevard front; even then it’s a hotel that comes from a side-street.  Other than that most of the buildings are shells now, or “Beirut” as one resident referred to it, shaking his head in dismay at his own comparison with a city that he’d only ever seen on television during the wars that Lebanon is known for.
Whilst the residents have moved, or been moved, out.  New people have come in to the frontage; dealers and sex-workers who are new to the area and who appear able to work freely there, whilst residents who have attempted to gather fire wood have been turned away – forced to leave the wood they had already gathered behind.
The workers aren’t sure.   The demolition starts this week says one; no next week says another, the new year my friends contributes a third worker.    They may not know when the demolition will start; but it doesn’t appear to be long before the buildings will start to come down on the district and community of Tarlabaşı.


Tarlabasi Boulevard - Images by jonathan lewis

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

Tarlabaşı eviction process underway

Small removal trucks dart along Sakızağaç Caddesi, the main artery cutting through the Tarlabaşı Yenileniyor project area, carrying elaborate piles of furniture, bags of clothing, carpets wrapped in cloth.
Ali, who ran a tiny shoeshine store 50 metres off Tarlabaşı Boulevard carries bags filled with shoelaces, brushes, shoe shining creams and pieces of leather down towards Dolapdere. The yellow building where he rented out a small shop in the basement was not sold yet, but, he says, he has found a nice shop just outside the project area. “No use waiting to the very last minute.” he adds. “They’d evict me sooner or later anyways.”
 (Jonathan Lewis)
The urban renewal project Tarlabaşı Yenileniyor was first mentioned in 2006, and slated for completion in 2010. The possibility of demolition has dangled over the neighbourhood like Damocles’ Sword for five years now, with rumours of eviction constantly present: they will come after school is out, after the municipal elections, maybe after school starts, surely after the referendum? While people had started to trickle out of the project area in Tarlabaşı by late 2009, many decided to test fate – and the likelihood of evictions starting just a tad later than official statements made believe.
The last rumoured estimate – that things would get serious after the national elections on June 12, that this time, they would start without any doubt, proved true, and to the surprise of many: After the AKP secured a majority of almost 50%, the AKP-ruled Beyoğlu Municipality has started evictions inside the project area in Tarlabaşı in cooperation with GAP Inşaat, and this time, they move fast. Eviction orders have been distributed to all those residents – both tenants and home owners – whose flats or buildings have been sold, and most residents who have found a home, workshop or shop elsewhere have moved out.
Handan* was evicted on June 24. Her door was welded shut immediately after the police and the municipality cleared out her apartment. “I was in the hospital with my mother when they called me to tell me that I should come to my Tarlabaşı flat immediately. When I did, they had already forced open my door and thrown all my things on the street.” Her son nods. “The police came with gas bombs and everything!” he adds excitedly.
Handan’s husband died five years ago in a car crash, leaving her with her mother and her son who goes to primary school in nearby Cihangır. Handan makes a modest living as a cleaner, wiping staircases in Beyoğlu. “The flat belonged to my husband”, she explains. “I could make ends meet because I did not have to pay rent.” However, since her marriage was only authorised by an imam, and never recognized by the Turkish state, the flat and everything the couple had jointly owned went to the husband’s first and “official” wife that he had never divorced. “She did not tell me that she had sold the flat to GAP”, explains Handan. “So when I received a notice by the company that I would have to clear out of my house, I was deeply shocked.”
The worst thing, she says, was to be treated like a criminal. “The police said I was committing a crime by living in the flat and called me a squatter.” After having received the eviction order, Handan started to look for a flat to rent, but was unable to find something she could afford. “I had bought cardboard boxes, I begged the police to give me one more night to pack my things. I told them that I had been looking for a new apartment but that I didn’t find anything.”  When the police and the municipality-employed packers started to throw her possessions on the street and onto a truck parked outside, Handan had a nervous breakdown. “One of the packers was very sad. He told me that it could have happened to him, that he felt sorry for me”, she recalls. “My neighbours later told me that they took all my things to a municipal storage room. I have not heard from them again, and I don’t know where that storage room is.”
Many of Handan’s neighbours are angry with the municipality and GAP Inşaat for handling evictions like they have with Handan. “How can they throw someone out on the street like that?” asks a local shopkeeper. Her downstairs neighbours, a retired couple from Antakya who have lived in their spacious Tarlabaşı flat for 20 years, feel sorry for the young widow now sitting on their couch for the interview. “If she goes back to her hometown, her father will sell her to an older man in marriage”, says Elif* and Handan nods. “I want to be able to stand on my own feet and provide a good education and a good future for my son. I have nothing left in Ağrı, I cannot go back there.”
Authors Note: We will now closely follow evictions and events as they unfold in the neighbourhood, and deliver more regular updates.
* Name changed by the author

"
Tarlabasi evictions - Images by jonathan lewis