Showing posts with label urban transformation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label urban transformation. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 January 2014

Networks of Dispossession

http://www.mulksuzlestirme.org

Collective data compiling and mapping on the relations of capital and power within urban transformation in Turkey

website http://www.mulksuzlestirme.org showing the distribution of money and
power within urban transformation in Turkey
The map above shows concerning to the website "what other investments do the developers of urban renewal projects have? What kind of partnerships have been established between the government and private developers during these processes of dispossession? To which certain investors have citizens' taxes been transmitted through the redevelopment/privatization of public space? Which corporate owned media outlets are censoring the ecological, economical and social destruction mega projects such as the 3rd airport, 3rd bridge and Ilısu Dam (Hasankeyf) will cause? In this network map,dispossession projects are represented in black circles. The size of the circle represents the value of the project. are represented in blue and directly connected to their projects. The media outlets are represented with their logo and are directly connected to the affiliated corporation. Work related crimes are noted in red next to the project. Supporters of Turkey's Olympic bid are noted in purple and the 13. Istanbul Biennial sponsors are indicated with turquoise colored text. The network map organizes itself by running as a software simulation, where the names naturally find their position on the canvas through connecting forces, revealing the central actors, indirect links, and organic clusters."

 

Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Let the Blames Begin

reblogged from NYT

September 11, 2013, 11:47
ISTANBUL — If he knew me, Suat Kilic, Turkey’s sports minister, would probably say that I decorate my backside with henna — Turkish vernacular for a naysayer who gloats over the misfortunes of others.
I did feel a twinge of regret late Saturday night when the news tickers flashed word that Tokyo, rather than my home city of Istanbul, would host the 2020 Summer Olympics. It would have been fun, and good for business, for the greatest sporting show on earth to come to town. But after a pause, I breathed a very deep sigh of relief.
I believe that hosting the Games would have given the Turkish authorities license to impose their pharaonic vision of Istanbul. The Olympic bid was already being cited as justification for building a third airport. This government revels in huge, environmentally reckless projects. It has madcap plans to build not just another bridge across the Bosphorus, but another Bosphorus altogether: a new canal to link the Black Sea to the Sea of Marmara.

Pro-government media are blaming Istanbul’s failure to win the games on us tree-huggers, especially the Gezi Park protesters. “The Hooligans are Happy” was the headline in the daily Aksam on Sunday. Kilic tweeted “They must have exhausted their supply of henna.”
The newspaper Yeni Safak has pointed a finger at Reuters — for daring to show that demonstrations in Istanbul were starting afresh by posting a photo of a restaurant full of tear gas on the day the International Olympic Committee made its selection. The police were trying to disperse a recent Gezi-style protest against plans to build a highway through a forest on a university campus on the outskirts of Ankara.
But the reason Istanbul didn’t win the Olympic bid had less to do with Gezi Park than doping scandals and game fixing in Turkish sports and the rumblings of war next door in Syria. The strength of its application was the city’s symbolism — great commercial center, past capital of an Islamic empire, link between Europe and Asia — but that symbolism wasn’t strong enough.
If anything, Istanbul is now in danger of becoming the symbol of a city divided, not just between Europe and Asia but by irreconcilable internal differences. The promotional video the Turkish government showed the I.O.C. depicted cappuccino-drinking young executives, out jogging, flirting and having fun. Yet these were henna-bottomed Turks: They are the ones who rallied to save Gezi Park and were pleased to see Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Olympics pitch turned down.
The government seems unable to deal with dissent from this freer-thinking urban professional class other than with police batons. And yet in its bid to host the Games — and to develop the city in just the ways these people contest — it touted their image as its own. I don’t know whether that’s the ultimate sign of disconnect or cynicism.

Andrew Finkel has been a foreign correspondent in Istanbul for over 20 years, as well as a columnist for Turkish-language newspapers. He is the author of the book “Turkey: What Everyone Needs to Know.”

Thursday, 16 May 2013

Brachiale Erneuerung in Istanbul

reblogged from NZZ

Wem gehört die Stadt?

Malerisches Chaos – bereits seit 73 Jahren überquert die immer stärker unter dem Verkehr ächzende Atatürk-Brücke das Goldenen Horn.
Malerisches Chaos – bereits seit 73 Jahren überquert die immer stärker unter dem Verkehr ächzende Atatürk-Brücke das Goldenen Horn. (Bild: Martin Roemers / Laif)
Eine massige Metro-Brücke über dasGoldene Horn stört den Blick aufs Stadtpanorama, der Taksim-Platz wird umgekrempelt, bald soll eine protzige Moschee vom Camlica-Hügel grüssen: Die AKP-Regierung hat Istanbul ein Modernisierungsprogramm verschrieben, das mit brachialen Mitteln umgesetzt wird.
Veronika Hartmann
«Ich bin Ihr Diener, und mir ist zu Ohren gekommen, dass Sie eine Brücke über das Goldene Horn zu bauen wünschen, doch niemanden finden können, der das kann. Ich bin Ihr Diener und weiss, wie es geht.» Diese Zeilen hat kein Geringerer als Leonardo da Vinci anno 1502 an den osmanischen Sultan Beyazit II. gerichtet, sie finden sich noch heute in türkischer Übersetzung in den Akten des Topkapi-Palasts. Warum da Vincis Entwürfe niemals verwirklicht wurden, ist nicht bekannt.
«Hätte er nur», mag es dem einen oder anderen heutzutage entfahren. Denn demnächst wird eine Metro-Brücke über besagtes Gewässer fertiggestellt werden, die bei den Istanbulern wenig Begeisterung hervorruft. Sie verbindet die ältesten Stadtviertel miteinander, nämlich Galata und Eminönü. Hoch oben ist sie und wird von einer Drahtseilkonstruktion getragen. Statt sich sanft in die Stadtsilhouette einzuschmiegen, verdeckt sie den Blick auf die historische Halbinsel mit Topkapi-Serail, Hagia Sophia und Süleymaniye-Moschee. Auch die Unesco, die bereits 1985 das gesamte Areal zum Weltkulturerbe ernannt hat und nun über dessen Schutz wacht, zeigte sich bei der letzten Begehung Ende letzten Jahres beunruhigt. Den Bericht dazu erwartet man in diesen Tagen.

Irreversibler Fehler

Der Architekt Ali Ulvi Altan, der als Projektleiter mit dem Bau der Brücke betraut ist, beteuert, dass die Unesco sich von dem Projekt habe überzeugen lassen. «Es ist ja noch nicht fertig, mit etwas Farbe und Beleuchtung kann man da noch einiges machen.» Eine Alternative hat es in seinen Augen nicht gegeben. «Das Problem besteht darin, dass wir an diese Route gebunden waren. Die einzig sinnvolle Lösung wäre natürlich eine andere Streckenführung gewesen, aber darüber wurde bereits in den 1980er Jahren entschieden. Damals war Denkmalschutz noch kein Thema», erklärt Altan. Da die Tunnel, die zur Anbindung an das Streckennetz der Metro notwendig sind, bereits in den neunziger Jahren gegraben worden waren, wollte die Stadt aus Kostengründen vom überalterten Plan nicht abweichen. Ohnehin hatte das Amt für Denkmalschutz bereits ein Dutzend Entwürfe abgelehnt, der jetzt umgesetzte war der einzige, der den behördlichen Segen erhalten hat. Massgeblich daran beteiligt gewesen sein soll übrigens kein Geringerer als der Istanbuler Oberbürgermeister und Architekt Kadir Topbas, auch wenn unter dem Entwurf offiziell der Name seines Kollegen Hakan Kiran steht.
Doch die Brücke ist nicht der einzige Streitpunkt, denn Istanbul gleicht einer Grossbaustelle. Die Strassenführung am zentralen Taksim-Platz wird unter die Erde verlegt, die bisherige Grünfläche zu einem Einkaufszentrum umgewandelt. Der Bosporus wird untertunnelt und ein weiteres Mal überbrückt. Weil eine Verbindung unter dem Bosporus bereits der Traum des Sultans Abdülmecid im Jahr 1860 war, soll noch vor der Fertigstellung des Marmaray-Tunnels mit dem Bau eines zweiten begonnen werden. Der ehemalige Hafen von Haydarpasa wird weichen und an seiner Stelle ein olympisches Stadion entstehen, der gleichnamige historische Bahnhof, der 2010 durch einen Brand teilweise zerstört wurde, soll als Hotel wie ein Phönix aus der Asche auferstehen. Camlica, einer der höchsten Hügel der Stadt und ein beliebtes Ausflugsziel, wird bereits in zwei Jahren von der grössten Moschee des Landes gekrönt, während ausserdem Europas grösstes Finanzzentrum und riesige Trabantenstädte aus dem Boden gestampft werden. Damit nicht genug, man nimmt Mass für einen neuen Bosporus, der Schwarzes Meer und Marmarameer einige Dutzend Kilometer weiter westlich erneut verbinden soll.
Natürlich darf auch der grösste Flughafen der Welt nicht fehlen. Es wird gegraben, aufgeschüttet und umgewühlt. Für den Bauboom, der an allen Ecken und Enden der Stadt die Bürger quält, gibt es verschiedene, auch sehr triftige Gründe. Zum einen erlebte die Stadt eine Bevölkerungsexplosion, wie man sie in vergleichbarem Umfang kaum findet. Während die Stadtväter in den 1980er Jahren noch mit rund 5 Millionen Einwohnern rechneten, sind es heute offiziell 12 Millionen. Dass diese Zahl viel zu niedrig gegriffen ist, zweifelt niemand wirklich an. Dazu kommen zum andern die unendlichen Ströme der Touristen, Besucher und Geschäftsreisenden. Und alle diese Menschen wollen nicht nur untergebracht, transportiert, ernährt und unterhalten werden, sie sind gleichzeitig dem hohen Erdbebenrisiko der Region ausgesetzt. Die Antwort auf diese Herausforderungen hält die Stadt in Form des Konzepts «Städtischer Wandel» bereit, eines grossangelegten Bauprojekts, in dessen Rahmen allein in Istanbul über 200 000 Gebäude abgerissen werden sollen. An ihrer Stelle sind moderne Wohngebiete geplant. «Und wenn es uns die Regierung kostet, das werden wir jetzt durchziehen!», versprach Ministerpräsident Tayyip Erdogan nach einem verheerenden Beben, das 2011 die Region Van im Südosten des Landes heimsuchte.
Als Folge werden nun in Istanbul ganze Stadtviertel wie das historische Sulukule oder das zentrale Tarlabasi entvölkert und die Anwohner, die oft zu arm sind, um sich zu wehren, enteignet und in Wohnsilos fernab ihrer alten Wohnstätten vertrieben. Die alte Bausubstanz wird komplett abgerissen, und es entstehen Luxuswohnungen und Büros, die Höchstpreise erzielen. Auf historisches Erbe, Denkmalschutz oder ausreichend Grünflächen wird nicht geachtet. Bereits jetzt gibt es nur noch durchschnittlich 3 Quadratmeter Grün pro Einwohner, in Europa sind 30 Quadratmeter Standard.

Kampf um Mitspracherecht

Nun mag es einerseits faszinieren, dass es den Baumeistern der Metropole vergönnt zu sein scheint, Grossprojekte so schnell umzusetzen wie in kaum einem anderen Land. Doch das hat seinen Preis, und diesen zahlen in Istanbul vor allem die Zivilgesellschaft, das historische Stadtgefüge und auch der Katastrophenschutz. Deswegen wünschen sich die Bürger eine Beteiligung an den Entscheidungsprozessen und auch einen Mindeststandard für die Raumplanung.
Nicht weit von der neuen Metro-Brücke über das Goldene Horn hat die Istanbuler Architektenkammer ihren Sitz. Er befindet sich im Stadtteil Karaköy, wo man den rasanten Wandel der Stadt gut beobachten kann. Was noch vor einem Jahrzehnt ein Hafenviertel mit Bordellen, Schiffsbedarf wie Ankern und Tauen sowie Elektroartikeln war, bietet heute immer mehr schicken Hotels und Cafés, Offices und Galerien Raum. Hinter einem Berg von Akten sitzt Mücella Yapici, Architektin und Aktivistin der Architektenkammer.
Für sie ist die Brücke nur ein Puzzleteil in der fehlgeleiteten Baupolitik der Stadt. Vor allem der Standort sei katastrophal gewählt, da gibt sie Altan gerne recht. Aber in ihren Augen sind die meisten Bauprojekte, die in Istanbul durchgeführt werden, durch nichts zu entschuldigen. «Das grösste Problem, das die Stadt hat, ist die Erdbebengefahr, Seismologen fürchten eine schwere Entladung der tektonischen Spannungen schon in naher Zukunft. Doch genauso schlimm ist nun die Bedrohung durch die Bausünden, die unter dem Vorwand begangen werden, die Stadt gegen eine bevorstehende Naturkatastrophe zu wappnen», erklärt Yapici. Denn wenn eine Gegend als Risikogebiet ausgewiesen ist, fallen die Auflagen des Denkmalschutzes weg. Laut Yapici trifft das auf 60 Prozent der historischen Halbinsel zu. «Schwer zu sagen, was mittlerweile schwerer wiegt. Zudem werden Grossvorhaben wie Brücken, Flughäfen, Tunnel von ganz oben entschieden. Vom Ministerium für Umwelt und Städtebau oder von Ministerpräsident Erdogan persönlich. Jede Epoche möchte sich eben verewigen und der Stadt ihren Stempel aufdrücken.»
Der öffentliche Raum wird also über die Köpfe der Bürger hinweg gestaltet. Sie haben keine Möglichkeit, eigene Vorstellungen und Ideen einzubringen – nicht einmal, wenn ihre eigenen Häuser oder Stadtviertel betroffen sind. Yapici, die im Namen der Architektenkammer gegen Bausünden zu klagen versucht, mit der Stadtverwaltung über Projekte diskutiert und bei Demos an vorderster Front für den Erhalt von kulturellem Erbe kämpft, freut sich, ein wachsendes Interesse der Bevölkerung an Fragen der Stadtentwicklung beobachten zu können. «Es haben sich Quartier-Initiativen gebildet, die sich jetzt auch untereinander vernetzen. Doch leider mangelt es in der Türkei an einer demokratischen Tradition. Hier hoffen die Menschen, dass ‹die da oben› schon richtig entscheiden werden. Abschreckend ist auch, dass friedliche Demonstrationen gegen die Zerstörung von Kulturgütern nicht selten von den Sicherheitskräften mit Tränengas und Wasserwerfern auseinandergetrieben werden.» Dennoch glaubt Yapici, dass immer mehr Menschen nicht länger tatenlos zusehen wollen, wie das Gesicht der Stadt verändert wird.

Zaudernde Unesco

Yapici kritisiert die zögernde Haltung der Unesco gegenüber dem von Stadt, Ministerium und Regierung praktizierten brachialen Umgang mit Istanbuls Kulturerbe und erklärt: «Seit 2006 tauchen die Brücke über das Goldene Horn, die Stadtteile Sulukule und Tarlabasi sowie die historische Halbinsel in allen Berichten der Unesco auf, und es wird damit gedroht, dass Istanbul den Status als Weltkulturerbe einbüsst. Aber passiert ist nichts, und ich persönlich glaube, dass sich durch die Globalisierung auch die Einstellung der Unesco geändert hat.» Nicht ganz so schwarz sieht das Brückenbauer Ali Ulvi Altan: «Ein Gutes hat die Brücke auf jeden Fall!», tröstet er. «Immerhin hat sie das Interesse der Menschen an ihrem kulturellen Erbe geweckt, sie setzen sich jetzt dafür ein und wollen, dass man es schützt.» Ausserdem gibt es bereits einen neuen Plan: Ein Stück weiter das Goldene Horn hinauf plant man den Bau der nächsten Brücke. Sie soll endlich so aussehen, wie Leonardo da Vinci es sich vorgestellt hat. Vom fernen Italien aus.

Sunday, 14 April 2013

Istanbulites ‘’stood up’’ for Gezi Park, the public park in Taksim Square

reblogged from Cihan Baysal, posted on reclaiming spaces mailing list

‘’Stand up! for Taksim Gezi Park’’ Festival organized on April  13th, continued the whole day long with the participation of thousands.

Thousands of Istanbulites resisted against the renewal project which comprises the demolishment of the public park, one of the rare open spaces of the city center with its spacious green plots and decades old trees, and the construction of a shopping mall in its place in the replica of the late Ottoman artillery barracks.  The Festival was organized by the recently established  Taksim Gezi Park Association under the umbrella of Taksim Solidarity. Istanbulites, from all ages, backgrounds, social and ethnic groups reclaimed Gezi Park whole day long till midnight.

Taksim Solidarity, consisting of professional chambers (architects and city planners), trade unions, grassroots, neighbourhood associations, urban platforms and urban movements, has been fighting against Taksim Project of the government, which will not only demolish one of the rare precious green plots of the city-and the more so for a city expecting its earthquake-but will also turn Taksim Square into an inanimate space by cutting its access to crowds.
Taksim Square happens to be the most important public space in Istanbul as well as in the whole country, where May 1st ralles, democratic demonstrations, New Year celebrations and all kinds of public gatherings are held.  The project, while preventing the access of crowds to the square and through demolishment of Gezi Park right next to the Square,  will transform the ‘’Agora’’ into a consumer space, in line with the neoliberal vision of the government.
The process was initiated by the implementation of the urban renewal project in Tarlabasi, a residential area of minorities, vulnerable groups, urban poor and low-income groups. The project has led to displacement of settled residents and unjust property transfers to high income groups.


''Stand Up for Gezi Park'' info:

http://www.facebook.com/taksimgeziparkidernegi

http://www.sendika.org/2013/04/istanbul-gezi-parki-icin-ayaga-kalkti/

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151607383422792










Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Criminalization of Urban Poverty by Turkish Prime Minister



reblogged from Reclaim Istanbul
by Yaşar Adnan Adanalı
Economic and social factors such as poverty, unemployment, bad housing and urban sprawl have been important factors that have fed terrorism year after year, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said in Istanbul today.
Speaking during an event in Gazioşmanpaşa district to preside over the demolition of hundreds of homes – ostensibly for the purposes of constructing modern housing in their place – Erdoğan made a connection between terrorism and bad urbanization.
“While in the east our soldiers and police officers fought terrorism, [previous governments] did nothing about the poverty, unemployment and discrimination that terrorist groups abused. They shut their eyes to the migration to big cities while they were building shanty houses. Urban sprawl became places of abuse that hid terrorism,” Erdoğan said, emphasizing that young people with no hope for the future became vulnerable targets of such groups. “We will transform those swamps into rose and tulip gardens.”
Erdoğan also responded to criticism about the 63-member Wise Persons’ Commission that held its first meeting on April 4 as part of its task of overseeing a peace process to end the Kurdish issue.
Erdoğan repeated that the seven groups of wise people that will visit each of Turkey’s seven regions to discuss the peace process would be free to do their own planning.
“We did not force them. But some seem very upset. Some cry out that they are not in the group, others are jealous. We are bustling about doing something to stop mothers’ tears, but some are still trying to gain [political] benefit,” he said.
Istanbul ‘overpopulated’
A former Istanbul mayor, Erdoğan also argued that Turkey’s fabled metropolis was too populous. “When I became mayor [in 1994], 8 million people lived in Istanbul. Now it’s 14 million. Is this how it should be? I don’t think so. We have to find a solution for migration,” he said.
The Turkish prime minister also criticized construction companies for building skyscrapers and tall buildings that now cover the entire Istanbul skyline, arguing that buildings should not be taller than four or five floors.
“We have to attach importance to aesthetics. You will tell me that 40- or 50-story buildings can de aesthetic, too. They can, I won’t deny it. But humans should live near the soil,” he said.

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

New Turkey wide Demolitions in the Name of Disaster Protection


 http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/id/25380523   text translated and links added by Cihan Baysal

''The Minister of Urban Affairs of Turkey has recently announced that the demolishments will start in October in 30 places simultaneously,  using dynamites in some .

The Minister of Urban Affairs, Bayraktar, declared that the agenda for the implementation of the Law on Areas Under Risk of Disasters has been materialized:
'' We will have a start which is going to cause reverberations. We are starting in October. In 30 or 40 different parts of Turkey, we will have demolishments'', stated Bayraktar. The prior cities will be Istanbul,Ankara,Izmir,Bursa,Kocaeli,Sakarya, Konya,Bolu and Van.

Upon the question of ''Do you experience any difficulty in social support?'', the Minister reflected that '' the people are very willing.We reached a dimension of voluntariness.Without getting tired,we explain to the people that they will be getting rid of their dilapidated  buildings under risk. Those who object to this, those who call it the 'transformation of rent/ profit' should come to me and tell me whom we are providing profit, I am expecting them to come''

Bayraktar stated that engineering studies are being made for demolishments that will take place in at least 30 cities. During the demolishments, alongside demolishing machines,explosion by  dynamite-a technique not familiar in Turkey- will also be used. Tests are being made in order not to cause any disasters via explosion by dynamite.It is notified that this technique will be used in places where the poplation is not dense. The Minister Bayraktar expressed that  because he did not like the word '' demolishment undertaker'' , they are looking for other words to coin the expression.

The financial portrait of demolishments hasn't been substantiated yet. The demolishments will give a start in October via 'ceremonies' and urban transformation is planned to be urgent in the first 2 years and scheduled to be finished in 5 stages in  3-5-7 and 10 year periods''.   

For the Law on Areas under risk of Disasters,please visit:http://direitoamoradia.org/?p=13059&lang=en

For the Minister's question on 'projects for rent/profit',
and

Suleymaniye: 

And the Tarlabasi renewal Project with 100 square meter luxurious offices going for 800.000 dollars while a 5 storey building owned by a resident was expropriated for 761.000 TL ( 423.000 dollars)!.So, the legally owned property is transferred to firms and companies:   

Friday, 13 July 2012

Poor but Proud Istanbul Neighborhood Faces Gentrification

By JESSICA BOURQUE
Published: July 4, 2012


“This is a good thing,” he said on a recent afternoon. “Everything here is in bad shape. No one here is washing or painting. They don’t know how to take care of the historical architecture of these buildings.”
“Here” is Tarlabasi, a low-income and primarily Kurdish neighborhood that also serves as a sanctuary for Turkey <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/turkey/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> ’s marginalized populations. In the heart of Istanbul, less than a five-minute walk from the Istiklal Caddesi shopping hub, Tarlabasi’s faded facades are in sharp contrast with Istiklal’s glitzy boutiques. The only thing separating Tarlabasi from the more affluent Beyoglu neighborhood is the six-lane Tarlabasi Boulevard, which has a police station equipped with a tank. 

Tarlabasi’s central location means it could become prime revenue-generating real estate, which is partly why Beyoglu Municipality officials and the Housing Development Administration of Istanbul, known by its Turkish acronym TOKI, declared it an urban renewal area in 2006.Six years later, after court battles over property rights, the project is moving forward. The renewal area encompasses a 20,000-square-meter, or 4.9-acre, section of Tarlabasi that includes 210 historic Ottoman-era buildings; demolition has been under way for a few months. 

At stake is Tarlabasi’s diverse culture. Migrant workers have a long history of living in Tarlabasi, dating from the early 1900s when Greek, Jewish and Armenian craftsmen lived in the area. But those groups were driven out by the wealth tax of 1942, which impoverished many non-Muslim workers, and in 1955 by riots that again focused on non-Muslims. Left vacant after the riots, many houses in Tarlabasi were taken over by workers who migrated from eastern Turkey to find work in Istanbul.
On its Web site, TOKI says the renewal process includes relocating residents to new housing complexes, “identifying the illegally settled households to be evicted” and clearing the land so it can be “regenerated through urban renewal projects.” These projects could include shopping malls, upscale housing units and urban recreational areas. The Beyoglu mayor, Ahmet Misbah Demircan, has said he wants the new Tarlabasi to rival the Champs-Élysées in Paris. 

While Mr. Yesildas, the furniture seller, calls the process a makeover, others see the transformation of Tarlabasi as a negative form of gentrification.The architect Huseyin Kaptan, director of the Istanbul Metropolitan Planning and Urban Design Center, said that TOKI’s renewal plan lacked foresight because it allowed the land to be developed by wealthy real estate investors who had no vested interest in preserving the culture of the area. 

“Unfortunately, this is very aggressive and very wrong,” he said during a recent interview. “To keep the social structure safe, you need to involve the people. Contractors get to build some modern thing — could be a shopping mall, could be a high-rise — but they have no regard for the people living there.” He added: “I call this kind of operation they’re doing, ‘killing them while kissing them.”’

Today, the area is home to a host of low-income laborers scraping by on the monthly minimum wage of 886.50 lire, or $493, or less, working jobs as unlicensed garbage collectors or serving as house cleaners for the better-off.Remziye Civak, 34, who keeps house for the owner of a publishing company, has lived in Tarlabasi for 18 years. Her immaculate two-room apartment also shelters her husband and their three children. “We are lucky,” she said. “We own our home, but many people are renting.” A place the size of her home rents for about 400 lire a month.

The sense of community is strong in Tarlabasi, Mrs. Civak said, and she would miss that if she had to move to a new housing complex in the suburbs. “My neighbors and I, we are like a big family,” she said. “If anyone is sick, I know I can call on my neighbor to come help. We are very close.”But she is nervous about the intensifying drug problems where she lives. “What really worries me is the drug use. It’s called pills. I don’t exactly what they are, but there is a lot of it going on,” she said, “I worry about my kids, because they are young and I think, ‘What if they get involved?”’ 

Yasar Adanali, an urban scholar, consultant and activist, said that, sadly, residents were not a priority for project planners.“Many kinds of informal, illegal migrants are living and seeking refuge in areas like Tarlabasi. Why? Because for them, it’s easier to find employment opportunities around Istiklal,” Mr. Adanali said during a recent interview.“This transformation plan doesn’t pay any attention to these social realities. Why not create social programs to help these people? Instead, they just take Tarlabasi as a problem zone, a cancer area that you need to erase from the map and rebuild for a completely new clientele,” one willing to spend money to become part of the economic boom in Istanbul and Turkey. 

“The city itself has become so deliciously profitable that you can make these kinds of real estate projects without actually involving the inhabitants of the area,” he said. “The real motive in these plans is the desire to make a profit.”It is also part of Turks’ desire to showcase Istanbul as a global city, “competing with global city-wannabes and global city-alreadys like London, New York or Dubai,” Mr. Adanali said. 

For now, local and expatriate students and artists attracted by this global metropolis are finding reasonable rents in Tarlabasi. Mitch Burmeister, an American university-entrance tutor, rented his first apartment there.
“I knew that it didn’t have the best reputation,” he said, “but I couldn’t pass up the rent. If you think of a city like Chicago, it would be like renting a dirt cheap apartment right off of Michigan Avenue.”
The notion that deep-pocketed foreigners are willing to live there only adds to the motivation for city officials to capitalize on the area, rebranding what was a zone of prostitution and drugs as a safe place to live.
The “new Tarlabasi” is advertised on a large billboard that hides demolished buildings from drivers along Tarlabasi Boulevard. The billboard depicts mostly light-skinned women wearing business clothes and strolling past a mall, an image far from the current reality there. 

While TOKI insists that Tarlabasi will maintain its historical architectural touches, Mr. Adanali fears the transformation will only create a facade to hide a sterile space. “It is a kind of ‘Disneyfication’ in the sense that it’s taking the area’s heritage and making it flashy,” he said, “like a Disney theme park. Everything becomes shallow.”Not all the houses in Tarlabasi are being “regenerated,” but some residents are still nervous about their future. Mrs. Civak said that while her house was not now included in the renewal plan, she could not be certain it would stay that way. “They’ve not told us much about what’s happening,” she said. 

Mr. Yesildas also conceded that he knew little about the project aside from what he had seen on the news. Still, he remains confident that the government’s plan will benefit Tarlabasi.“This area wasn’t meant to be permanent. It was supposed to change,” he said. “It has so many problems that need to be fixed. It should be clean and taken care of.”

Thursday, 1 March 2012

SIGN PETITION - TAKSIM BELONGS TO ALL OF US


Demonstration on Taksim indicating that the construction works is underway!


text from the same page:

TAKSİM PLATFORM: PRESS RELEASE AND SIGNATURE PETITION
What Does the Recently Proposed Taksim Project Involve?
The recently proposed Taksim Project calls for the construction of enormous ramps --10 meters deep and 100 meters long-- leading to subterranean tunnels directing traffic under Taksim Square. The ramps will be located at seven points near the square, including Gümüşsuyu, Sıraselviler, Mete, Tarlabaşı, and Cumhuriyet Boulevards. High concrete walls will be erected, and the existing sidewalks along the boulevards will be transformed into service roads. The trees in the vicinity will be cut down, and it will be difficult, if not impossible, to reach Taksim Square by foot. Underground tunnels will not solve the problems of urban transportation and traffic. Urban planners throughout the developed world have long since discredited them.

THE TAKSİM PROJECT IS NOT ABOUT MAKING THE SQUARE MORE PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY (despite claims otherwise)

How Was the Project Passed through Official Channels?
The present plans for Taksim Square were announced by the Prime Minister before the elections. The Istanbul Greater Metropolitan Parliament then approved them by vote, after which the Istanbul No. 2 Regional Agency for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage Sites passed the bill with speed unprecedented  for a “reconstruction project.”
Despite being a public initiative financed by city taxes, residents of the city and civic organizations have not been informed of, nor consulted about, the details of the project. The Metropolitan government has not provided any means for public discussion. It continues to ignore the voices of various groups and individuals who have the expertise to evaluate the effects this project will have on the urban fabric of Taksim.
THE LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN PLANNING AND PASSING THIS PROJECT VIOLATES EVERY PRINCIPLE OF PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY

What Do We Want?
We want transparency and the opportunity for input in the redesign of Taksim Square. Urban development plans should take into consideration those residing in nearby neighborhoods as well as those who work in and visit the area. Transportation projects should not be planned by decree from above, nor in isolation from their environment and residents. The latest holistic approaches need to be taken into consideration during the design of transportation systems, viewing them as part of the overall urban fabric.
As the highest-profile and most symbolic square in Turkey, Taksim Square means many things to people of many different walks of life. Democratic participation in deciding how to design and use this public space is just as important as it is in rewriting the Constitution.
The days of reckless urban development and planning without public consultation are long over. It’s time to do things differently. Let’s start with Taksim Square. Let’s join together and make this an example of how city officials can successfully work in conjunction with civic groups and citizens for a better designed city space for everyone.
We call upon the city officials of Istanbul to serve their constituents in a transparent and democratic way.
Taksim belongs to all of us!http://www.taksimplatformu.org/english.php